Taking Aim at the Mod Squads

from the the-customer-is-always-right dept

A good article in Business 2.0 takes aim at the various companies that freak out when their fans create any modification of their products, even when those mods are likely to increase fan loyalty and build sales in other ways. The writer points out that sending cease-and-desist letters to your customers seems like a fairly shortsighted strategy. These days, however, companies seem to have forgotten that the customer is always right - assuming that, for some reason, it doesn't apply when it comes to digital goods.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Mark Fox, 14 Oct 2002 @ 9:01am

    X-Box is different

    MS loses money on each X-Box sold, they do not want people buying them to run Linux or to run pirated games. I see nothing wrong with them trying to prevent people from modifying them.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Brian Prince, 14 Oct 2002 @ 9:15am

    Thousand Poppies Bloom

    One of the key insights of the curve jumping .com era was the idea that you should develop something, release it, and "Let a thousand poppies bloom.".
    The truck was invented to haul raw cargo. Should the people that build and sell small campers for trucks be stopped? Or maybe the people that haul boats? People started doing these things with their trucks, and the manufacturers integrated that into their offering.
    It is impossible to know what the public will do with your creation once you release it from the lab and into the wild. Creators should embrace this, and roll these ideas into newer versions.
    note: Sorry I can't attribute the quote. I think it as a Chinese philo, but I couldn't find it on google.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Steve Snyder, 14 Oct 2002 @ 11:05am

    Bottom line is simple

    If I buy something, it's mine. To do as I please with it. Of course software companies argue you don't buy or ultimately own software, you license it for use. And that might hold up for software (though I still think it shouldn't) but it does not apply to hardware--even if they try EULA's. The courts will thrown them out--because the fact of the matter is when a customer buys an X-box, they pay money to take physical possession of a physical object. And as long as mods haven't illegally reverse engineered the product or stolen IP (sometimes they do, sometimes they don't) no one can tell some one they can't sell them.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Oct 2002 @ 11:16am

    Re: Thousand Poppies Bloom

    The quotation is from Chairman Mao, "Let a thousand flowers bloom."

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    LittleW0lf, 14 Oct 2002 @ 11:59am

    Re: X-Box is different

    MS loses money on each X-Box sold, they do not want people buying them to run Linux or to run pirated games. I see nothing wrong with them trying to prevent people from modifying them.

    Whose fault is this? The customers or the companies? Take a basic economics class and then think about it. Since when has a companies failure to compete become a license to abuse their customers?

    If Microsoft looses money on each X-Box sold, that is their problem, as they are competing with two companies that make better/cheaper products. They either need to find a cheaper way to make their product, or they need to raise their prices and deal with the loss of customers to competition. Getting angry with customers for modifying their products is going to do nothing to help either situation, is it?

    If I go to the hardware store and buy a hammer to use to break windows, what sort of legal action can that hammer manufacturer do to prevent me from using their hammer in that fashion? And what if I am legally breaking windows (as part of some sort of recycling program?) The fact that I might be breaking the law using their hammer gives them absolutely no right to send me a cease and desist letter for using their hammer. Why is Microsoft treated differently?

    Microsoft is trying to play a dangerous game. They are attempting to low-ball their competitors by loosing money on their X-Box to gain it back with licensing of software after their competitors go out of business. Typical for Microsoft, which of course will raise the prices as soon as their competitors disappear. Them playing the game is their choice, not their customer's, and thus their loss has nothing to do with this issue.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.