Do VCs Need A Report Card?
from the good-or-bad? dept
Here's a debate that's been going on for a while. As it stands now, VCs don't really need to disclose how their portfolio companies are doing and can pretty much value the company however they want - until they're gone, sold, or going public. This leads to some vast discrepencies in how different VCs value the same exact company, and that (perhaps) should be a concern to the people who have invested in VC funds. This article calls for a more standardized disclosure process, a VC report card, to help keep VCs honest. I understand the arguments, but I there certainly are downsides to doing things that way as well. As soon as you add in that public report card, you get a Wall Street Effect - where companies will be pressured to do short term things to boost these public numbers. The nice thing about being a private company was that you didn't necessarily have to worry about those things - and could take a longer term view.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Long term view?
I think startup companies (maybe not good startup companies but the vast majority) are run by "What's the exit strategy" VCs so the sequential quarterly growth is always the most important thing. If any thing the management of non-public companies are even more spineless -- the public shareholders rarely force you out so they can appoint their college buddy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]