Smart Email Addresses Could Slice Spam
from the the-next-step dept
In the past, the question of single-use email address systems like Sneakemail have been discussed here. Now, a researcher at AT&T is trying to take that system even further to prevent spam. His idea is to not only have multiple single-use emails, but also to encode in the email address the rules under which people could use it. Whereas most current single-use emails are designed to be deleted if mis-used, this plan would designate that a certain email address can only be used if emails are sent by a certain company. Of course, there are some problems with this system (as mentioned in the article). You would still need a general purpose email - and if that got out, then you'd get plenty of spam. Also, if someone doesn't realize the email address you've used with them is specific to certain circumstances they may try to contact you later only to have their messages bounce - and not understand why.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
Spammers found my bigfoot address by chance, and my ISP account by chance. Use all the re-directors you want (and Mike knows I use a lot), but they'll ultimately find your ISP.
So, the only way this won't let spam through that backdoor is if you have a whitelist.
If you have a whitelist, will building these "new" features into e-mail offer you any more protection.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
me at you dot com
most humans understand the meaning, but virtually no email harvesters do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
me(atsymbol)myisp.fuckoffspammers.com
or takethisout.me@removethistoo.myisp.com
and so on...
And at this point, you (as a spammer) will now have to keep adding/programming new rules and now the spammer is playing catchup with the spammee...rather than as it is now where the spammee is playing catchup with spam by writing new filters everytime something else gets thru.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Slashdot offers this
"mrmultimedia@yahCOMMAoo.com minus punct"
Yes harverstors can be written to pull out the real address, but it's difficult to do on a large scale, and changes weekly so as you said they're always playing catch up. Plus the current one seems especially good to me because the code to pick the real info out has to be pretty smart--it either has to know that the word "COMMA" or whatever else they use is actually a form of punctuation--or the person has to actually think of all the words that might be used "period" "questionmark", etc which is a whole lot of time to spend.
[ link to this | view in thread ]