Thoughts On SuperNova
from the too-typical-for-the-people-who-were-there dept
A few people have asked me for any summary thoughts about the Supernova conference, since I chose not to "blog it live" like so many others did. Before I went to Supernova, I had told Kevin Webach (who organized Supernova) that the list of speakers certainly was impressive, but that I had seen most of them before, and knew pretty much what they would say. He promised that this would be a different kind of conference, where it would be almost entirely panels, and he would challenge the presenters. Unfortunately, it didn't quite live up to that. Certainly, there was a great collection of thinkers at the conference and I heard some really amazing ideas. Unfortunately, almost all of those ideas came during smaller conversations during the breaks or at meals - and I didn't even get to speak to everyone I had hoped to. If ever there were a conference that should have been more interactive (dare I say more "distributed"?), this was it. It didn't live up to what it could have been, but Kevin is a smart guy, and hopefully will adjust future versions of Supernova to reflect that. He brought together a group of incredibly deep thinkers - and it would have been great to really let everybody brainstorm or discuss things in a more open format. Instead, we got typical conference presentations and typical conference debates. Adding things that involved everyone more, and took them a bit out of their comfort zone (for example, forcing someone to defend a position they don't agree with) could have led to a much more exciting event. I don't often agree with stuff Dave Winer says, but his idea (based partly on his experience at the conference) for a new kind of conference makes a lot of sense. I know I would be interested in going to such a conference.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
