Tech World Not Impressed By Bush Plan

from the a-big-shrug dept

Well, it seems that the technology world is almost universally unimpressed by Bush's plan to stop taxing dividends. The articles are appearing everywhere, saying that the plan is "no help at all", that it "falls flat" for technology firms, and even one that calls it "troublesome" for tech firms. The general consensus seems to be that this move helps big investors in old-time companies, and does little to nothing to help tech companies - who still need to use their cash to invest in future growth.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    euroman, 8 Jan 2003 @ 3:07am

    Wood / Trees

    What inane comments. The whole point of this move is to let GWB's rich oil friends become even richer. It is not intended to help anyone else. Why would you think this was the case?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Jan 2003 @ 7:53am

    This helps everyone not just Bush's buddies

    When I first had some money to invest I made the conscious descision NOT to invest in tech companies. I did this because my grandfather told me that dividends didn't lie. Essentially he never invested in a company who didn't pay him back. He didn't trust companies that didn't pay dividends and now I don't blame him. Dividends are a sign of profit. Why doesn't M$ offer dividends? They have $40 billion! Most of the companies I invest in have a 2% or more yield, this yield makes a bear market tolerable. And that this yield won't be taxed definately persuades me to invest more in dividend producing stocks. Finally if tech companies started paying out dividends then maybe they'd stop investing money in ventures that are doomed to fail.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    Mike (profile), 8 Jan 2003 @ 9:37am

    Re: This helps everyone not just Bush's buddies

    While dividends definitely do make sense for stable companies in mature markets, they don't make sense for companies in growing markets where investment is needed.

    The investments in "failures" are all part of the process of risk taking that creates the huge successes that make the technology industry able to innovate the way that it does. Giving incentives to people to rewards mature markets at the expense of innovation is a dangerou long-term strategy.

    You're welcome to invest your money however you want, but don't assume that just because your grandfather said something, it applies to all companies in all industries.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Ed, 8 Jan 2003 @ 9:50am

    Re: This helps everyone not just Bush's buddies

    I think AC's onto something. Stocks used to be priced based on the rate of return they paid through dividends. With tax disincentives resulting if few companies paying dividends, stock prices have lost touch with reality, resulting in the boom/bust of the last several years. I'd like to see the so-called double taxation of dividends eliminated if for no other reason than to return to the expectation that profitable companies should return some of that profit to shareholders through regular dividends.

    However, what bothers me about this proposal is that it doesn't apply to stocks held in tax-deferred 401(k) and IRA accounts, which are probably what most people have. If that's accurate, then it's completely dishonest for a supporter of this to quote figures like 'this will affect 75 million stockholders in the US' without noting that the change wouldn't make any difference for most of them.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Steve, 8 Jan 2003 @ 2:35pm

    Re: This helps everyone not just Bush's buddies

    It doesn't apply to stocks in tax deferred vehicles because their dividends aren't taxed. Dividends are reinvested and you don't pay taxes on them because they're tax deferred--in the end when you take the money out and its' taxed as income, indirectly the growth due to the reinvested dividends is taxed, but directly it isn't. Though as you said, it's dishonest to say that this would affect stockholders who only have tax-deferred holdings if they're included in the 75 million.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.