RIAA Wants Money From ISPs
from the not-as-stupid-as-it-sounds dept
Here's a topic that will probably generate a strong response. Hilary Rosen is apparently now suggesting that the RIAA start charging a fee to ISPs for all the P2P file sharing that's going on. While this is a bad idea, it's not as awful as most people seem to think it is. I've said all along that file sharing is a (certainly not the only one, but certainly "a") reason that people sign up for broadband access. It makes sense to me that the ISPs, in some sense should look at free music sharing as a "promotional cost" of getting people to sign up - and thus, shouldn't be averse to paying some sort of fee to music publishers. One of my arguments concerning AOL/Time Warner is that they were stupid for not doing exactly this: offer free music sharing to anyone who signs up for their broadband access, and then take some of that money and pay their artists with it. However, the logistics of the Rosen plan are a bit out of whack. This might have made sense a few years ago, if the labels and the ISPs worked out the details together. But, to come back, retroactively and say "you owe us..." is only going to cause problems. Also, determing just how much they "owe" is going to be silly, as the RIAA has a history of misusing numbers in determing just how much they've "lost" to theft. Update: In a related story, the head of the IFPI is now saying that file sharing threatens thousands of jobs. I hate to break it to him, but any technology advance tends to "threaten" jobs. It's up to the industries involved to figure out how to deal with it - and not to fight it. As Andy Grove pointed out, the printing press sure put a lot of monks out of work. Things change. The guy is also quoted as saying that the music "creators" are being "denied the right to choose how their music is used and enjoyed". Of course, again, I'd have to point out to him, that the creator of something never has the "right" to determine how their product is enjoyed once it's out in the open market. The market decides that for themselves.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
My spoken word recordings
When I put them up on a P2P network and someone DLs them and I am unpaid, am I not intitled to a chunk of the ISP tax now? How about a bigger chunk when I raise the price to $250,000?
Doesn't MY copyright and MY pricing scheme matter? Or does it only matter if you are Sony Corp?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: My spoken word recordings
>Or does it only matter if you are Sony Corp?
yes, it does...
wake up...Sony and such rule the world... of course they will set the rules.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]