SBC Claims They Own The Patent On Consistent Navigation
from the lovely dept
It's been some time since we've had one of these absolutely ridiculous patent claims, but there are crazy lawyers everywhere looking for ways to ge a little bit more money. The latest appears to be SBC Communications which is claiming to own the patent on consistent navigation throughout a website, and are asking some small sites to pay up their license fees. The exact patent is viewable here. I'm a bit confused as to how the navigational setup of a website can be patentable. I'm also a bit confused as to what lawyer would think they could get away with trying to get websites to license such an idea. The whole thing is so ridiculous that it makes me wonder if it's a hoax of some sort, though, it's not the most ridiculous internet patent lawsuit we've seen.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
As aways, sue the little guy
SBC's biggest claim should be against the W3C. Since the way SBC describes it, they have a patent on pretty much anything that uses frames, so the entire set of frame tags & attributes is patent infringment. Or maybe they should invoke the DCMA since the frame tags are a tool whose sole purpose is to violate their patent.
In addition to the drastic patent reform needed, there really should be means for the defendants to have all their legal fees paid by the plaintiff if they win. That way, when you know there's no way in hell a claim has any validity, you can get the lawyers necessary to win and have the plaintiffs pay them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
From what it looks like...
Then again, so does just about every government website, including the ones I am particularly responsible for managing....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: From what it looks like...
[ link to this | view in thread ]