In Net Attacks, Defining The Right To Know
from the to-fess-up-or-not dept
The NY Times is taking on the issue of whether or not companies should publicly announce when they've been hacked or hit with a virus. This debate has gone on for ages, and companies still seem to feel that it's best to keep things quiet. For the most part, they're afraid of the bad publicity such announcements might give them. However, they're also concerned about other side effects. We recently had an article about companies that said they were too busy to help police and the FBI with investigations into computer security breaches. The NY Times article talks about a new study that suggests that companies that do report security breaches become less likely targets (while also getting more information out there to allow companies to build stronger security). However, many disagree with that, believing that public announcements only make them bigger targets.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
