CLECs: Back From The Dead?

from the is-it-possible? dept

For the past few years, conventional wisdom has said that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 was set up so badly that it killed off the competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), who were supposed to be the "new, competitive phone companies" that would grow the telecom world by offering newer and better services through competition with the baby bells. Of course, now most of them are out of business. Instead of blaming the telecom act, however, this article says it was just good old fashioned competition and bad decision making that killed off so many CLECs - and that the remaining few are poised to do well over the next few years. They point out that, with the opening up of the Baby Bell's networks, many CLECs started offering undifferentiated services, and it's tough to stay in business without any compelling competitive advantage. Meanwhile, during the boom years, they also invested heavily in capacity and back-office systems, and when they couldn't find enough customers for their services, they started discounting everything to the point where they were losing money on every deal they signed. This basically suggests that the CLECs competed themselves out of business. However, now, the article predicts, with the competitive market cleaned out, CLECs have a real opportunity to build a strong business.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    LittleW0lf, 31 Jan 2003 @ 7:31am

    The real point?

    So what they are trying to state is that competition doesn't work and the only way to truly run an enterprise is via a monopoly then, huh? Hmmm... No wonder Microsoft is so innovative, customizable, and good for business.

    I guess what we really need now is a law which makes competition illegal, since the Telecommunications Act worked so flawlessly in this regards.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.