What Symantec Knew But Didn't Say
from the oops dept
Anti-virus and security companies are known for overhyping. It's what they do. Every time there's a new security hole or virus they put out tons of press releases about how it's the biggest problem since the internet was invented. Now, it looks like Symantec is getting in trouble for a slightly different form of overhyping: overhyping what they knew but didn't say. They came out with a press release saying that they knew about the Slammer Worm before it came out. However, they only told their customers who were subscribed to some sort of premium program. There are a ton of questions raised by this. First off, how did they know and when did they really know it? If the virus spread in 10 minutes, how is it that they say they knew about it hours before anyone else did? More importantly, what obligation did they have to let the wider community know? Some are accusing them of being "accomplices" to the spread of the virus for seeing it and not doing anything to stop it (unless you were a paying customer).
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why should a company be held to higher standards t
Would you accuse an individual of being an accomplice because they found out about a virus or worm and didn't inform the entire frickin' world about it? I think not.
Symantec is NOT responsible for making sure that the world is safe from worms (or viruses for that matter). Symantec makes money by providing a service (be it virus protection, Internet host security, or whatever).
People now-a-days seem to always want to blame someone else for things that happen to them and not take personal responsibility.
If Symantec was the one that created the worm, then that's a different matter, but they didn't (as far as I know). Why should we expect Symantec to keep us all safe from the evils of others?
That's just my 2.40653 yen.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
Slammer debuted at 9:30 pm PST.
Symantec issued an alert shortly after 9 pm PST.
The rest of the internet noticed shortly after midnight EST. I thought midnight EST is 9pm PST.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why should a company be held to higher standar
[ link to this | view in thread ]