Microsoft Going After Hotmail Spammers
from the one-small-step dept
Microsoft has been accused of being "friendly" to spammers via their Hotmail service, but now, they're trying to change that by suing some of the people they believe have been harvesting Hotmail addresses. Microsoft hasn't yet tracked down the spammers, but instead filed a "John Doe" suit, which they'll use to try to track down spammers. While I'm all for smacking down spammers with as heavy a stick as anyone can find, there is a fine line between forcing companies to give up a spammer and forcing them to give up the name of someone who is downloading music...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess we'll have to wait and see.
Why?
Simple. Stopping spam is against Microsoft's best interest. They make money selling "premium" accounts on hotmail...what's a premium account? An address that 1) has more space and 2) does NOT get "inactivated" when it gets full. So, to sell "premium" accounts its easy for them to let the "junk mail" folder fill up (and it does quite fast - mine fills up my 2meg quota in 2-3 days...if I don't login while I'm on vacation, the account is useless) and then they "inactivate" the account (meaning that ALL mail TO the account is bounced until you log in and delete some stuff) and then they suggest that this wouldn't happen if you fork over 29.95 a year...
No, its not in their best interest to stop spam.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]