NASA's Profit Mission

from the commercialization-under-fire dept

There are plenty of products on the market these days that claim to have been created as part of NASA's space program. Now, Newsweek is looking at how NASA's commercial efforts have come under fire. This apparently started well before the recent Columbia disaster, as many people are wondering why NASA should take part in any commercial activities at all. Defenders of the program point to some of the results and say that it's great that NASA can apply it's resources in a way that gives something back to society. Others, though, think that it's a waste of time and money (since NASA often pays for the research, and gets little in return). Even worse, some think it may be a distraction for NASA.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    dorpus, 25 Feb 2003 @ 1:22am

    What's the use of space exploration?

    Remind me again, what exactly is space good for? Other than unmanned satellites, we've come to the overwhelming conclusion that space life is highly unhealthy for humans. As for developing new real estate, it would be a lot easier to build cities on Antarctica or underwater than other planets. Unless we want a Mars of public housing projects and starving refugees, to export our problems away.

    Even with unmanned satellites, the new frontier is looking to be unmanned airplanes in the stratosphere that could serve all the same functions at a lower price. The search for new life forms is proving to be much more productive in underwater environments. Until there is a way to cheaply travel light years away to earthlike planets, maybe about 500 years from now, manned space exploration is a white elephant.





    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    sahdev Gahlay, 27 Apr 2006 @ 2:28am

    NASA

    I really do think that NASA sucks!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    sahdev Gahlay, 27 Apr 2006 @ 2:28am

    NASA

    I really do think that NASA sucks!

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.