High-Tech Hospital Of The Future?

from the it's-about-time dept

Last year we wrote about the idea of computerizing hospital records and getting rid of all the paper. The big concern that everyone seemed to have was about privacy. However, as someone pointed out in that article, with paper records anyone in the hospital can probably just pick them up and read them (especially if you're wearing a white coat). That sentiment is echoed in this new article about how the Indiana Heart Hospital has ditched the paper trail and gone digital. They've found the advantages to computerizing everything to be extensive. For example, any time a prescription is written, the computer checks for possible conflicts/allergies and immediately alerts the doctor. Someone in this article also makes the point about privacy saying, "we have an audit trail so that anyone who ever looks at your chart, we can tell who it was and when it was. Whereas with a paper chart, anybody can look at it and we'd never know who it was." Of course, the big difference between digital records and paper records, though, is that the digital records can be duplicated and seen anywhere. The paper records work on a "security by obscurity" method since there are only a few localized copies.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    dorpus, 14 Mar 2003 @ 8:22am

    New set of problems

    1. Do they back their data up? Stanford University Hospital once spent millions on an IT system from Cemax, but never thought to back their data up. When the server crashed, all records were lost forever, so the hospital dismantled their IT system. This scenario has happened at quite a few other (famous) hospitals where the doctors and MBA's who run the hospital had no idea how computers work. A French hospital stored their server in a 14th-century dungeon, where rats ate it up. Hospitals are typically loathe to hire their own IT staff, or if they are hired, their needs are ignored -- "those guys just want money".


    2. The fat fingering problem -- a doctor, nurse, or other technician may check the wrong box on the digital clipboard without realizing it, leading to serious errors.

    3. Misleading menus, faulty software logic -- this could happen as a result of programmer incompetence, or even politically based confusion within the hospital for the appropriate protocol.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.