Using Port Scans And Proxy Servers To Route Out Censorship
from the do-the-ends-justify-the-means? dept
Wired News is asking if the "ends justify the means" for an anti-censorship tool that will let anyone see if any particular website is banned in certain countries. The problem comes about when you look at how the tests are done. The system scans the ports of machines in those countries, looking for an open one, and then uses a proxy server from that machine to try to access the website in question. The method makes sense, but many still see it as illegally (or at least, unethically) hacking into someone else's computer, and using resources without permission. The guy who created the system first seems to say that there's nothing wrong with it, and then basically shifts tactics and says it's worth doing no matter what, because it's important to "uncover" censorship and surveillance.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]