CDMA Pushed On Postwar Iraq

from the oh,-come-on... dept

In a move that is clearly politically motivated, a Congressman from the San Diego area (home of Qualcomm) is introducing a bill saying that any new mobile phone system in Iraq needs to be CDMA based (which, of course, is mostly Qualcomm's technology). There are, of course, technology reasons why this both makes sense and doesn't make sense. Considering the fact that most of the Middle East is currently GSM technology, from a compatibility for travellers standpoint, GSM probably does make a lot more sense than CDMA. In the long-term, it probably doesn't matter, though, as all of these technologies are in for upgrades. However, in the short-term (besides jumping the gun a bit, considering the fact there's a war still on...) its so overtly a political move that I'm surprised anyone even bothered. I'm not sure what the legislative reason behind putting together such a bill would be. It would make sense to lobby the government contractors to use such a system, but why have an entire law requiring such technology be used?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Alex, 27 Mar 2003 @ 1:59pm

    No Subject Given

    So it's not a war for oil, after all.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Joe Schmoe, 27 Mar 2003 @ 2:23pm

    Freedom Phones

    It's an anti-French thang, here's another perspective -

    http://www.unstrung.com/document.asp?doc_id=30387

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    bish, 27 Mar 2003 @ 5:46pm

    The French Connection

    Of COURSE there had to be a french angle to the whole thing. Argh!

    (note that at least 3 of the words above were French)

    The idea of persecuting the French over their wish to not perticipate in the invasion portion of the Iraq conflict, opting instead to die of DU-induced cancer in the post-crush attempt to delay the massive kurd/sunni/shiite civil war, really gives the US a bad image. Please tell me that Americans can see this .. do they care, or do they really think it doesn't matter?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Mar 2003 @ 12:48am

    "Iraq will be independent"

    So now U.S. bills have jurisdiction in Iraq?

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.