Benetton Backs Away From Smart Tags In Clothing Line

from the that-didn't-last-long dept

Benetton got a lot of attention last month for announcing plans to incorporate RFID "smart tags" to help them better manage inventory. Today, however, they seem to be backing off those plans, saying that they're analyzing the idea, but none of their clothes use the technology, and they're still not sure if any ever will. It's unclear if they're backing down because people made a stink about privacy issues, or if the original announcement was overhyped well out of proportion with the nature of the deal (using the chips for "tests", rather than in an actual product).
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    dorpus, 4 Apr 2003 @ 4:01pm

    Maybe it's the sense of touch?

    Shirts are annoying enough with the nylon labels rubbing the backs of our necks. Unless the RFID chip can be made very small or very flexible, it will annoy users. And given the clientele of upscale women, maybe there were concerns that the chip could somehow be used for voyeurism?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Huw, 5 Apr 2003 @ 1:30am

    easier ways

    What's wrong with just putting a barcode on one side of the tag? Certainly cheaper than 'smart tags'.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Michaela Stephens, 5 Apr 2003 @ 6:57pm

    Sense of touch + cost of embedding process

    Very true, the nylon labels rubbing the back of our necks may feel nice compared to a microchip rubbing the back of our necks.
    The additional issue of cost is also related to this. (As background, the scratchy nylon tags are a result of a cost-reducing process of attaching a tag on the shirt in the first place. This process usually involves placing a hot iron against the tag while it is held in place so that the tag will melt to the shirt. Also, this process is very quick, so that mass-production is not hindered.) Clothing manufacturers would have to figure out a cheap fast way of bonding the chip onto the tag and bonding the tag onto the shirt. Obviously a hot iron would be bad for the chip package.
    If they back-pedal and decide not to use the chips after all, it would probably be because they would have done the math and found that it would cost more to attach the chips to tags than it would to have clothes stolen occasionally.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    mhh5, 7 Apr 2003 @ 12:16am

    Re: easier ways

    how about "nanobarcodes"

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.