If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Hertz Ordered To Tell Court How Many Thousands Of Renters It Falsely Accuses Of Theft Every Year
- Even As Trump Relies On Section 230 For Truth Social, He's Claiming In Lawsuits That It's Unconstitutional
- Letter From High-Ranking FBI Lawyer Tells Prosecutors How To Avoid Court Scrutiny Of Firearms Analysis Junk Science
- FTC Promises To Play Hardball With Robocall-Enabling VOIP Providers
- FOIA Lawsuit Featuring A DC Police Whistleblower Says PD Conspired To Screw Requesters It Didn't Like
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why?
It is not the libraries job to circumvent the law; just abide by it. It is *your* choice if you want to avail yourself of public services, but you cannot reasonably expect the same amount of privacy as if you were at home in your closet. (I understand that there really is not that much more privacy there either...)
The United States is slowly being eaten alive from within.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why?
Besides, more information does not mean better information. As far as we know established terrorist protocol is to conduct all exchanges of material information via face-to-face meetings or via blind drops, not via library facilities. Our HSA would better spend it's time securing vulnerable targets rather than pouring over library receipts for Ossama.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why?
Beyond collecting information about you (which is bad enough) the big fear is the possible misinterpretation of that information.
You aren't necessarily a terrorist because you read certain book, but someone will likely ASSUME you are eventually when they profile you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]