Congress Says Porn Domain Names Must Be Clear
from the hmm... dept
Congress today passed some legislation having to do with online porn. Among the less talked about clauses is one that says you can go to jail if your domain name is "misleading" and has porn on it. At first, this doesn't seem like a huge deal, but when you begin to think through the details, it can be problematic. First, it's incredibly subjective on both important words. How do you determine what is "misleading". How do you determine what is "porn"? In both cases there will be some situations where it's obvious, but there are plenty of "fine line" cases that will depend very much on interpretation. What if someone puts up "erotic art" on a website that uses their name as the domain name. It could be considered misleading because the domain name doesn't make it clear what the content is. It could be considered porn, depending on local standards. However, most people would have trouble believing the owner of such a site deserves to spend time in jail. There are just too many ways this law can be abused - and having seen how previous internet laws have been abused, I have a hard time believing this one won't be.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The real reason
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The real reason
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bad link, Mike! :P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bad link, Mike! :P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interpretation
A workable alternative (that I've considered for years), is to require adult websites to use an alternate domain like ".xxx". This would require 2 things:
1st, a legitimate interest in making for-profit adult entertainment sites easier to determine (thereby acknowledging that Internet pornography as a legitimate business.)
And 2, a governing body to regulate and enforce this statute. I don't know if ICANN would be up to this task, so it may require more bureaucracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]