SBC Seeks Changes That Would Raise Net Access Prices

from the this-can't-be-good dept

I'll admit that I don't know enough of the details about this story to have a definite opinion on it yet. However, from what is written here, it certainly does seem like a scam by SBC to put other local telecom companies out of business. The question is how much SBC should charge other phone companies to carry internet traffic accross their network. SBC is pushing for higher per-minute fees and a "per-mile fee" depending on the distance of the call. Of course, the distance should have absolutely nothing to do with anything, and doesn't change the cost of the phone call at all. All it really does is make it less likely that other local internet service providers will stay in business.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Apr 2003 @ 5:23pm

    No Subject Given

    SBC has been forced for a long time to sell their networks to competators at a loss to them. They can't afford to provide services at a loss and stay around.
    Do you really blame them?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    DV Henkel-Wallace, 16 Apr 2003 @ 8:37pm

    Oh cry me a river

    SBC has been forced for a long time to sell their networks to competitors at a loss to them.

    Yea right. I have never believed this argument in the slightest. If this were true the other bells could come in and poach from each others' turf. Hell, SBC could be doing the same in reverse.

    This multi-carrier access rule does screw up the investment calculus, as does most regulation, but that's an unrelated issue.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.