Is Artificial Intellect Really Thinking?
from the does-it-really-matter dept
Roland Piquepaille writes "Can machines think? The question is tricky. In this Washington Times article, Fred Reed says that even if a computer can be labeled as artificially intelligent, the so-called intelligence actually is in the software. Reed says that even a chess program is made of building blocks -- typically a "move generator" and an "evaluation routine" -- which are not really intelligent. Reed also argues that most of us recognize intelligence without even having a clear definition of what it is. So who cares if machines are intelligent or not? He adds that "for practical purposes, and certainly in the business world, the answer seems to be that if it seems to be intelligent, it doesn't matter whether it really is." Check my blog for more comments."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
AI criteria
1) Ability to respond to external stimuli in a non-arbitrary manner.
2) Ability to make use of past stimulus/response experiences in responding to future stimuli.
While this sounds overly simplistic, I don't think our current level of technology is adequate for the task.
[ link to this | view in thread ]