Plain Old Telephone Service Could Get A Lot More Exciting
from the fighting-back dept
I've bought into the belief that the "landline" telephone system (or the "plain old telephone system" - POTS) is in a process of steady decline - to be replaced by a variety of other technologies such as voice over IP and various cellular systems. POTS is simply too expensive without allowing you to do very much, and the old-school telephone companies seemed blind to the competition. Things may be changing somewhat, though. Researchers have been working out ways to add some intelligence to the old landline, allowing it to function much more like the overhyped (but underutilized) VoIP systems we've been promised for years. Of course, you still have to wonder if the phone companies will adopt it, but if done correctly, they could hold back the VoIP tide for some time. In the long run, though, the decentralized nature of VoIP makes it pretty difficult to beat by a centralized system.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
VoIP spam paradise?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And what about V44?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pointless
A basic clue for them: my PCS cell phone works both at home and most everyplace that I go. If I had a landline phone, it would only work at home. Explain, please, why I should get a landline phone if I have a cell phone?
There are two misfeatures of landline phones that I'm very glad to be rid of: paying for long distance service, and phone solicitors. Also, I'm glad not to have to deal with GTE/Verizon for the landline and with the exasperating and often infuriating long distance companies. I really don't care about buddy lists and that stuff... at home (where my landline would be), I have a (gasp) computer.
But even fixing those things wouldn't tempt me to get a landline. The reason that I don't have a landline phone any more is simple: I don't need it because I have a cell phone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pointless
Better reception and cheaper international phone calls?
>phone solicitors.
What if solicitors call your cell phone?
> Also, I'm glad not to have to deal with >GTE/Verizon for the landline and with the >exasperating and often infuriating long >distance companies.
What if GTE/Verizon has an infuriating process of cancelling cell phone subscriptions, or of charging vast sums for cell phone calls when the buttons got accidentally pressed inside one's pocket and made a phone call?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pointless
A Tampa-area newspaper said of GTE "they think they're Ma Bell, but they're only Ma Kettle." Or something like that.
My fault for compounding the GTE grief by using MCI for my long distance. A more infuriating combination would be hard to imagine. Not that I'd want to imagine anything worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]