Key Legal Battles Forge Fate Of Free Software

from the testing-the-limits dept

Dan Gillmor is talking about how open source software is about to face it's first real "legal battles" and they could really impact the future of software development. He discusses the SCO-suing-every-Linux-user issue that's already been discussed to death, but also brings up another (potentially more interesting) case. This one isn't in court yet, but might get there. The question is whether or not the GPL is really enforceable. OpenTV is apparently using GPL software in their product, but has refused to make it available - or is attaching conditions to making it available. OpenTV says there's been some miscommunication over the issue, and they have every intention of making their code available - but it does raise the issue of how the courts would treat code that is GPLed. I agree with Gillmor's take. It's a contractual issue. If you're messing with GPL code, the conditions of use are clearly stated, and you agree to them when you use the code - so you're contractually bound by them. If you don't like it, don't use GPLed code.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    alternatives, 21 May 2003 @ 9:45am

    Nice attitude - now what about?

    If you're messing with GPL code, the conditions of use are clearly stated, and you agree to them when you use the code - so you're contractually bound by them. If you don't like it, don't use GPLed code.


    Now, what about when people REMOVE the BSD copyright (or other copyrights) and REPLACE it with the GPL?

    All the talk about 'rights' is great. I'm all for rights. But why is it the GPL-righteous? What about when the GPL steals from others? Like the charge by SCO VS IBM?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Mike (profile), 21 May 2003 @ 10:12am

    Re: Nice attitude - now what about?

    If it is stolen, then it's wrong. That's pretty simple. I don't think I made any claim otherwise.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 May 2003 @ 7:02pm

    Suppose SCO wins....

    ...so what.

    It will be the shot heard around the world that hit nothing

    Will people stop using linux? No.

    Will Red Hat and other linux vendors cease to exist? No.

    Will SCO return to profitability? No.

    So, what's the point.

    The community is espically bemused that Microsoft actually paid the SCO extortion fee. If SCO were smart, the would stop there.... but they're not and they'll most likely lose.... and then Microsoft will have one less competitor.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.