Keeping Government Out Of The Broadband Business
from the good-or-bad dept
Bryan writes "This is fitting. Since there's a growing number of local governments getting into the municipal broadband business (either because the local companies won't serve them, or serve them badly), there's now a push to outlaw government competition in both Ohio and Pennsylvania. It's definitely a growing controversy that will be getting noisier over the next several years as more communities get fed up with their broadband service and the companies begin lobbying heavily to stop the trend. Broadband Reports has posted an interesting interview with Jim Baller, one of the country's most experienced attorneys in municipal broadband, and he tries to dissect some of the conflict and answer the tough questions surrounding the idea. "
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Government Participation
I have a friend who owns a Television production company and gets competition from the local PBS station who undercuts his prices under his costs. They can do it because they get government subsidy and tax-free donations to cover their capital costs.
In the case of Internet access, the FCC rulings of the past few years have destroyed the independent ISP who built the public Internet by offering dialup accounts for $20/month. These same small business have been effectively been dealt out of the equaltion by Michael Powell in the FCC rulings that consider telecommunications as strictly a LEC v LD issue and competition as an issue between cable monopoly v DSL monoply.
Those of us who have lived this nightmare know all we will be left with is a monopoly with the surviving technology. The proper decision, if competition was really important, would be to prohibit the LEC from providing data services (such as Internet access) and let ISPs (or CLECs) compete among themselves with fair UNE-P pricing for Internet services. But face it, the LECs own the FCC and the rest of us have to deal with them both on the wholsale and retail level.
As far as municipal competition is concerned I think it is strictly a straw man in the larger battle. It is better than having Lexis claiming ownership to the court recrods that they were paid to collect with public funds.
-Murrel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]