A Day In The Life Of An AOL Spam Catcher
from the catchin'-spam-all-day-long dept
AOL claims that they're getting tough on spam, but if you ever wondered how they do it, it's a bit less sophisticated than you might imagine. They apparently have a group of people sitting in a room looking over user complaints and deciding whether or not the flagged emails are spam. Actually, to be honest, the story reads somewhat similar to the story we had recently about those who hunt down porn for web filter companies. What I found most surprising in the article is the hesitancy the main person had in declaring certain emails spam. All of the examples she brought up were clearly spam (things like advertisements for human growth hormone, advertising lower mortgage rates, or "turbocharging" your sex life). Yet, on each one, she would say something like, "that smells kind of fishy" or "most likely, that's spam".
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Smells like spam"
The new question is: is this ILLEGAL SPAM THAT CAN BE ATTACKED? To use existing laws, it helps if the target spam makes illegal or unsupportable claims and statements, or does something illegal about address concealment.
If there is such a thing as herbal generic viagra that might really work, the humans at AOL should decide it's "not spam" because they can't attack its originators as well as the originators of other "spam".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Block address?
They block the Reply-To: address and wonder why it doesn't stop the spam as "they keep changing their address"?
When was the last time you got a spam with a legit From/Reply-To address?
If I ever got a spam with a From: address that was really going back to the spammer, I'd send off a nice mailbomb/DDoS/virus.
[ link to this | view in thread ]