Microsoft Linux? Or Microsoft Unix?
from the heard-this-before... dept
Ryan writes "Microsoft working on a version of Linux? Mike Elgan writes that the Redmond company is losing its grip on the government market, and when the corporate market falls it will be motivated to release its own Linux distribution. Microsoft Linux may soon be more than just a hoax!" Of course, the argument isn't based on any actual knowledge, but just a reasoned guess. This rumor/prediction seems to pop up every few months, and I usually just ignore it. However, now, the latest I, Cringely column has a much more well reasoned analysis of why he thinks Microsoft is going to launch their own Unix. He thinks that's the real reason behind their recent licensing of Unix IP from SCO. They realized that if they're going to launch their own Unix-style operating system, why not make it actually Unix, instead of Linux? As I said, these rumors (and hoaxes) have been around for ages, so I wouldn't put too much weight into them at this point.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Brands of Unix Junior
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Brands of Unix Junior
Linux never claimed to be a Unix Jr, merely Unix-like. Its flavors aren't incompatible, a linux kernel is a linux kernel. Sure you can argue about rpms, or tgz, but for the most part, what compiles in one, compiles in all with minimal fuss.
There's no "cacophony" of linux dialects and standards...there's choice. Something you don't always have with windows.
Its not for everybody, that's fine...but seriously, you should learn a bit more about what you are talking about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why would Microsoft need a Unix?
Microsoft already has a product that they consider to be better architected and more advanced than Unix (that product is NT for those following along at home). Now it's true they are having trouble getting NT to be the "sturdy server operating system" that Cringely envisions, but that is because they keep throwing features in. Presumably if they did the same to a version of Unix (which they would, of course), it would be just as vulnerable.
And if Microsoft wanted to ship an OS with a great command-line shell and Unix utilities and daemons, it could just bundle them with NT (or Windows Server 2003 as it is known now). In fact such utilities already exist and the code is owned by Microsoft. Cringely describes this as a "hybrid" of Unix and NT but it would be more like 99% NT and 1% Unix, with the Unix part layered on top like so much frosting on top of a cake.
Now I think I had heard that one of the reasons Microsoft did not bundle all that stuff (I mean things like ksh, a good telnet daemon, grep, etc) despite owning code for them, is because of licensing issues, so maybe THAT is what is behind the SCO license, but if Microsoft actually did this, it would be an epic case of cranial-gluteal removal, because I still think the company just doesn't "get" Unix and command-line tools, as I have written elsewhere.
- adam
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NT 3.1 will be a better UNIX than UNIX
They also called the idea of running your programs on a central server and using terminals to display the results "outdated".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: NT 3.1 will be a better UNIX than UNIX
Microsoft, when they first started shilling NT, one of the pitches was 'NT will be a UNIX than UNIX'
They also called the idea of running your programs on a central server and using terminals to display the results "outdated".
Let us also not forget bill gates also said no one would ever need more than 640k of RAM. I'm sitting at 1.5 gb at the moment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]