Net Radio Debate Simmers Despite Deals
from the can't-please-everyone dept
As expected, plenty of online webcasters aren't too thrilled with the recent rates set by the RIAA. Even though they're significantly lower than past rates, many non-profit online broadcasters see problems in the rates. There are too many limitations, and some are complaining that they had no say in the deal. It still seems a bit short-sighted for the RIAA to try to squeeze money out of a group of people who are trying to promote their artists for no financial benefit to themselves. Allowing the stations to promote the artists seems a lot more likely to bring in revenue to the industry than going around and forcing these tiny webcasters to cough up $500/year. Update: Wired News has more details about why some are unhappy. Apparently, there are still plenty of playlist limitations, and the rates only apply if you have fewer than 200 simultaneous listeners. If you get to be more popular, you suddenly have to pay a lot more.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
