File-Sharing Networks May Battle Each Other

from the a-music-industry-dream dept

Because they're such big supporters of intellectual property (yes, there's some sarcasm here), Brilliant Digital, the folks behind Altnet - and possibly behind Kazaa as well, have announced that they're going to go after every other file sharing network they can find for patent infringement. The company claims they own a patent on using a hash to identify files. Of course, this comes right after the company announced they're basically out of money.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    The Pyro Beastial Necrofeliac, 6 Jun 2003 @ 9:17pm

    No Subject Given

    Oh yeah.
    Well I own the patent on file transfer. Everyone who has ever turned on a computer and moved a file from one computer to another is in violation. I plan on suing the world! Wooo hahahaha.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2003 @ 7:04am

    patently obvious

    Isn't the idea of using a one-way hash to identity fall under the catagory of "obvious"?

    I thought patents had to be non-obvious, unique inventions.

    Whoever gave them that patent needs to be lined up against the wall and shot.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    The Pyro Beastial Necrofeliac, 7 Jun 2003 @ 9:06pm

    Re: patently obvious

    Well yes, but then they couldn't approve as many patents if they did it that way. I think the rational with the current regime is approve as much as possible, and let the courts sort it out. Unfortunately, the courts don't really care either. At some point, this is going to get real sticky if people don't start doing their jobs.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.