A Mathematician Plays The Stock Market

from the not-everything-is-math dept

I've never been a big fan of the so-called "technical analysis" method of investing in the stock market, since it seemed to have a huge fatal flaw: it was all based on past events which might have absolutely no bearing on the future. It's the nature of independent events. However, many people do believe in it, as well as many other "mathematical" methods for predicting the latest turn in the stock market. The San Jose Mercury News has an interview with a math professor discussing some of these methods and the people who get caught up in them in his new book, A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market. Not that the professor feels high-and-mighty about these things, because he fell for a lot of them just as hard (if not worse!) during the boom and bust. The interview does point out the one thing that I think is the most useful "trick" in trying to predict the stock market. You have to realize that you're not really trying to predict the values of the underlying companies - but you're trying to predict what everyone else in the market is going to do. For that matter alone, you shouldn't necessarily ignore something like "technical analysis" just because it, by itself, is basically useless. The fact that so many investors do use it, means that it's useful in understanding how they're going to invest - which is useful knowledge.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Doug, 9 Jun 2003 @ 12:48pm

    Flawed flaw

    [technical analysis] seemed to have a huge fatal flaw: it was all based on past events which might have absolutely no bearing on the future. It's the nature of independent events.
    The flaw in the flaw is that stock prices are not at all independent of prior values; they have a very high auto-correlation. And it's not just the prices themselves that have auto-correlation, it's pricing trends.

    I'm not well-versed in technical analysis, but from what I can tell it mainly is looking for indications that the pricing, and price trends, of a stock are being influenced by something other than auto-correlation.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    farouk, 30 Sep 2008 @ 4:59am

    technical analysis

    i believe technical analysis is important for determining the timing for buying a stock but not the stock itself, for example if i found that its a good opportunity to buy coca cola then i would then check the technical charts to find the right timing

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.