Followup On United Email Pricing, Not As Bad

from the but-still-not-great dept

Yesterday I had the story about United Airlines' plans to offer email from the friendly skies, suggesting that they were making the same mistake they made with Airfones and charging prices that were way too high. Alan Reiter has tracked down a lot more information on this issue, and it turns out that United's press release was terribly misleading - in a way that could harm plenty of potential emailing business. It's not a total of 2k that a user gets - it's 2k per email. Any email you send or receive that's greater than that gets charged the additional fees. Okay, that's slightly better, but still seems pretty pricey. 2k is not a very long email by any means. Glenn Fleishman at WiFi Networking News points out another reason why this is likely to fail. The system doesn't let you download emails to your own email client. You have to use a proprietary Tenzing client - which accesses your email server. They do this to decrease the bandwidth, since the Tenzing client strips out images and other high bandwidth items. However, as Glenn points out, most large corporate email systems (the types from companies that would be willing to expense such things) will never let such a non-VPN'ed foreign email client access its mail server. That basically knocks out their target market. Offering very limited solutions at high prices isn't going to appeal to many people. I realize that offering internet in the sky is a more difficult proposition, but it appears that a much more complete offering is possible (such as from Connexion). Spending a little more to offer a lot more would go much further in this case.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.