How Google Edits The Web

from the very-interesting dept

Alan Johnson writes "While surfing, I came across this article at Microdoc News: Google Powered Search: How Google Edits the Web The most interesting part of the article states: "What we can say is that even though Google maps a particular universe of results, the Google tool only allows us to see a mere fraction of the possibilities it actually located and databases. The more we study this phenomenon, the more we understand that Google powerfully edits the web and reveals only what the Google algorithms allow us to see. We do not see a comprehensive list of what it has in its database, and we do not see what it misses out." Even though Google is a big database, it certainly does not allow us to see even the results it does have in its database. In this article it shows how Google only allows us to see a fraction of what it locates." If you read through the actual article, the details aren't quite as "sinister" as these quotes suggest. Basically, the complaint seems to be that Google only shows the first 998 results of a search, and doesn't let you go any further. As far as I can tell, the only "harm" this is doing is to researchers who are looking to catalog "all" of something online and trying to use Google for that purpose. If you're just doing a regular search, then, I sure hope you can find the relevant page in the first 1,000, or you might want to refine your search criteria a bit. Google's stated purpose in search is to help people find pertinent information - not to be a catalog of all things. This isn't really how Google is "editing" the web, but how someone is trying to use their tool for a purpose it wasn't designed for - and then complaining that it doesn't work.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Andy, 18 Jun 2003 @ 8:54pm

    verbified

    When did "database" become a verb?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      MWAF, 19 Jun 2003 @ 4:26am

      Re: verbified

      Probably when the writer got to the end of the sentence and couldn't be bothered to think of the right word. Don't these people know when to consult their animated paperclip?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2003 @ 5:01am

    Other recommendations?

    What other search engines should we be using? Any suggestions?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    kai, 19 Jun 2003 @ 5:51am

    No Subject Given

    I'm guessing that google's attitude is if you can't find your result in the first 1000 or so, then maybe you'd be better of refining your search query, rather than looking manually through the next billion pages. I don't find that particularly strange or evil.

    I don't think Google is "editing" the web, though they are placing value judgements on web pages. That's what a search engine does!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      CHIA GARCIA, 19 Jun 2003 @ 6:39am

      Re: No Subject Given

      Their pagerank algorythm is wrought with problems. I still use dogpile.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.