Virtual Presidential Primary Complete With Traditional Vote-Rigging Allegations
from the the-more-things-change... dept
Apparently, the political activist group MoveOn.org has decided to hold a "virtual Democratic primary" to help them decide whether or not the organization should come out directly supporting a particular candidate for President. The problem is that many candidates see the vote as being "rigged" for internet friendly candidate Howard Dean. We've spoken about Dean's internet campaigning efforts before. The other candidates say that the primary is unfair because a MoveOn employee spent some time working for the Dean campaign, and they recently sent all registered MoveOn users an email urging them to vote for Dean. MoveOn claims that the top three contenders each got to send out an email, and it was just that Dean's went out first. Of course, I wonder why they let just the top three contenders do so. It would seem much more fair to let them all send out a campaign note - or to let none of them do so. As for the employee, MoveOn says they loaned out one employee to Dean's campaign to pass on his expertise about organizing activists online - and that they would gladly loan him out to the other campaigns as well, if they were interested. It sounds to me like this is more of a campaigning/marketing issue than one of "vote rigging". Dean was quick to court the online savvy voters, and thus he's likely to do well in online popularity polls. For the other campaigns to complain about this just shows that they didn't realize the importance of embracing the internet and its ability to let them connect directly with voters. While it would be nicer if MoveOn has an "across the board" policy with respect to the campaign emails, overall, this doesn't seem any different than if a candidate were complaining that one of his competitors was getting more votes in the state of California because he spent more time campaigning there. You get back the votes you campaign for. Dean campaigned online, and now he's getting those votes. Besides, this isn't really a "primary". It's just a vote to see who MoveOn will recommend its members give money to.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
another way....
There is in fact a better way for people to organize their political donations to presidential candidates online. PayDemocracy is neutral, and doesn't act as a bottleneck to people's opinions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]