Copyright Infringement Bad; Hulk Smash!
from the and-yet... dept
I've been seeing this story all day today, and was debating whether or not it was worth posting. A man in New Jersey has admitted he is guilty of distributing a copy of the new Hulk movie online. He received an advanced copy, digitized it, and put it online. Clearly, that's a violation of copyright. Even he admits it. He's now facing up to three years in jail and a $250,000 fine for doing this. However, the Hulk opened last weekend to the tune of $62 million, so you really have to wonder what impact this bootleg copy had? The people who are likely to download such a movie are big fans - who are also likely to go see the movie "on the big screen". Once again, going to the movies is a social event. It's not something that's replaced by a downloaded copy of the movie. In fact, I'm willing to bet that many of the fans who downloaded the movie also went to the theaters to see it - and those that didn't, probably wouldn't have gone anyway. So, yes, this guy clearly broke the law - and, thus, should be punished. However, I find it hard to believe he actually did any "damage" to the movie industry.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
Now, they don't release the DVD at the same time the movie goes into the theatres... that would just be bad business, and would diminish the overall revenue.
When this fellow made the movie available for downloading, he basically "released the DVD" all by himself. The same logic applies... it's not good for business.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
My question is this: Do you HONESTLY BELIEVE that any fanboy who spent countless hours (at least 4 or 5 if not days) downloading a bad copy of the movie (even the best quality copies are not even VCR copy-grade) didn't (or won't) see the damn movie once or a dozen times in the theater???
I'm not saying what this guy did was right...but I don't buy that this damaged anyone's revenues...while personal experience isn't statistically relevant, I'm sure mine isn't atypical...I find that most people I know who went through the trouble of downloading a movie like say...Lord of The Rings also saw it 3-4 times in the theater, bought the DVD, then bought the Collector's Edition DVD etc...where was the money LOST????
[ link to this | view in thread ]
hulk bad
I think if the movie is really good then the leak won't hurt it because people will want to see a clean copy. If the movie is only so-so many people will be satisfied with the copy and not bother to see the movie in the theater.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why so fast???
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why so fast???
[ link to this | view in thread ]