Lessig/Eldred Bill Seeks To Loosen Copyright Law's Grip
from the well,-look-at-that dept
Okay, I've been proven wrong. With all the hype that went into Larry Lessig's petition to change copyright law, I thought most politicians would see it as a bunch of geeks protesting nothing. However, today, Lessig-friendly Congressional representatives Zoe Lofgren and John Doolittle have (extraordinarily quickly) introduced exactly the legislation Lessig wanted. I'm impressed and happy to be wrong in this instance. The bill is called the Public Domain Enhancement Act and will require anyone who owns a copyright that is over 50 years old to pay a $1 fee, to avoid having it fall into the public domain. If the owner fails to pay the fee, the works go into the public domain. This means that Disney can pay out a buck, and keep control of Mickey Mouse, but the majority of other works that received copyrights back then, which are now out of print or out of circulation completely, would enter the public domain. The more I think about this law, the more sense it makes (I wasn't so sure at first, I'll admit). The only one in the article here who complains is (of course) the MPAA, who has clearly misunderstood the bill. They say that it will actually harm consumers, because any works that fall into the public domain no one has any incentive to do anything with them. Yeah, you can't make a dime off of Shakespeare any more, can you? Oh wait, how many movies in the last few years were simply remakes of Shakespearian stories? Anyway, the point is that the works that would fall into the public domain are ones that no one is promoting anyway - so to suggest that this law makes them less likely to be promoted is ridiculous.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
