Intel Adding Support For Dual Band WiFi

A couple months back there was some discussion as to whether or not Intel "blew it" with wireless by releasing a Centrino chip that offered 802.11b instead of 802.11g. At the time, I argued this was ridiculous - since the (g) standard hadn't even been set yet, and the number of people it would make a difference for was minuscule. Well, now the (g) standard has been set, and Intel has announced that instead of (g) chips, they're going to be offering dual mode chips that support both (a) and (b). I'm not sure what the point is. Almost no one is using (a), so the added benefit is tiny - but they're going to charge nearly twice as much. They say they will get around to having (g) Centrino chips by the end of this year.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: wifi, wi-fi


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Ian Forrester, 26 Jun 2003 @ 4:17pm

    Adding support for dual band

    Could be something to do with Intel putting tons of RnD into 802.11a. They even have many wireless base stations which are based on (a), and we actually deployed them for wireless bridges a year or so ago. Maybe a mistake on our part, but you can see why Intel want to squeeze as much out of (a) as possible.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.