Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  thecaptain, 2 Jul 2003 @ 5:52am

  
  

  I don't know about those numbers not being useful.

  The point seems to drive home the point to everyone that spam COSTS EVERYONE. For years spam-fighters tried to get the message across that even if you pay a flat fee for your net use, you still subsidize the bandwidth that spam uses (what is it now...50 percent of all email?). People simply could NOT understand that in any meaningful way (as opposed to fax spamming where paper cost came out of their pockets...that riled them up a lot faster even tho its the same principle.).
  Spammers ALWAYS take the defense in interviews in this manner: "Just hit delete, that takes no time and its easy...what's the big deal?"
  Well the big deal is simple cost in time and money. I get paid say 30 bucks an hour, so if I spend 10 mins a day sorting through spam (that's a hopeful figure, its usually a bit higher) that means I spent 3 bucks daily dealing with the crap spammers dish out...so 3 bucks a day for 365 days adds up to 1095 bucks a year in wasted time...time that I didn't ask to waste, that I can't avoid...you can add to that bandwidth and service costs from my ISP that are rolled up in my monthly fee, plus the few megs off of my download limit and it adds up...and why should I have to pay this cost? Can a spammer answer me that?
  Simple numbers...but they make a point.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Oliver Wendell Jones, 2 Jul 2003 @ 7:03am

    
    

    Re: I don't know about those numbers not being use

    the captain,
    
    No offense, but $30 an hour and you can't perform simple math? :-)
    
    If you spend 10 minutes per day, that is 1/6 of one hour or 1/6 of $30 which is actually $5 per day, which means your total amount wasted works out to $1,304 based on $5 per day and 5 days per week and 365.25 days per year.
    
    If you're truly working 365 days per year at $30 per hour ($87,660/yr assuming 8 hour days), you can probably afford to hire someone to sort your spam for you.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      thecaptain, 3 Jul 2003 @ 5:38am

      
      

      Re: I don't know about those numbers not being use

      *blush*
      
      Oops :)
      
      I'm a programmer...we don't DO math :>
      
      We have computers for that...
      
      grrr, that's what I get for typing too damn fast..thanks
      
      On the other (or original) point, I *could* hire someone to sort the spam for me...but again..why should *I* incur that cost? :) Why would my income mean that I have to pay to receive spam?

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  michele, 2 Jul 2003 @ 7:16am

  
  

  New, better, worst data

  Hi Mike,
  
  take a look at this article on the BBC
  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3032488.stm
  
  bye
  
  Michele Costantini
  KaminadaLab
  http://radio.weblogs.com/0112986/
  ___________________________
  Whaling Voyage by one Ishmael

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]