Former FCC Chairman's Plan: Government Subsidized Fiber To The Home

from the hmmm dept

I noticed a few Supernova attendees commenting on their own sites about former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt's claim that the government should be subsidizing the installation of fiber to the home. Now, Dan Gillmor has written up a brief summary of Hundt's remarks and why Hundt thinks it's worth government money to make sure that every home has real broadband connections. He specifically suggests that their be a $20/month charge to every homeowner, which goes towards implementing this plan, while also saying this would let the government cut out other fees, such as universal service phone subsidies while canceling the requirement that TV stations send out over-the-air digital broadcasts. Both would be unnecessary, if everyone had fiber to the home, though you can just imagine how much people would complain if they had to pay this $20/month fee. Hundt's basic rational is that fiber-to-the-home is critical infrastructure that is better built under the centralized control of government (like the highway system) than through competitive methods. He plans to write a much more detailed paper about how this plan would work. While I like the idea of fiber-to-the-home, I always worry about government mandated technology choices - because (like Clay Shirky's Supernova talk about Minitel), doing so locks you in to a technology, even after it is obsolete.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Jul 2003 @ 5:08pm

    No Subject Given

    That's absurd. Mandatory levies and government management of what's just an extended human requirement? That'd be like the government running the health care system, and that's just wrong. After all, see how competition and IP has made it possible to offer decent, affordable healthcare to all americans; it's obviously the best system in the world. Few people are sick, everyone gets the operations they need, etc.
    No, there's no need to have a single organization controlling infrastructure like that. It'd just be a monopoly, if it wasn't the government doing it.
    Americans are not too apathetic to make the capitalist method work: America's the pride of the world economy!

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.