Google Cache Raises Copyright Concerns?

from the with-who? dept

Making a story out of nothing, the folks at News.com have decided to write a long report on the issue of whether or not Google's cache violates copyright law. It might be an interesting issue if someone was complaining about it - but no one is. Most people understand the cache for what it is, and realize that it's useful some of the times. They also know that, if they don't want their material cached, they just need to let Google know with a tag on their site. Seems pretty straight forward. Of course, with the rising Google-backlash going on, I imagine some angry anti-Googler will take this story and try to build a lawsuit out of it. The legal issues, however, are far from clear. While people say that, technically, the cache may violate copyright laws, so, then would everyone visiting a website that they don't own the copyright to - since the content is temporarily cached on your hard drive. It seems like this is a pretty clear case of fair use rights, and the story is making a big deal out of nothing.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    juniormint, 10 Jul 2003 @ 4:53pm

    been there, done that

    Google was sued several years ago over this exact thing - courts decided it was ok so long as they didn't cache entire cases or full size images.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. No Subject Given

    It's like I always say, if you don't want people downloading it, copying it, using it, or seeing it in any way forever, don't put it on the web at all. Think of the security of the printed word. It's incredible when you think about it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    kai, 12 Jul 2003 @ 6:03am

    copyright

    well two things that sort of bother me about google's caching/spidering:
    1) it works on opt-out rather than opt-in. As a web-reader I like it the way it is, as a web-master it can be annoying.

    2) they spider places that are *not linked* on the internet, and then cache those areas. For instance, if you only linked to content at techdirt.com/content/... they would try spidering techdirt.com/ anyways. I suspect this is how they end up with password files and other embarrasing items. I think it's a little invasive to spider something that isn't linked on the internet, then to cache it.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.