Google Cache Raises Copyright Concerns?
from the with-who? dept
Making a story out of nothing, the folks at News.com have decided to write a long report on the issue of whether or not Google's cache violates copyright law. It might be an interesting issue if someone was complaining about it - but no one is. Most people understand the cache for what it is, and realize that it's useful some of the times. They also know that, if they don't want their material cached, they just need to let Google know with a tag on their site. Seems pretty straight forward. Of course, with the rising Google-backlash going on, I imagine some angry anti-Googler will take this story and try to build a lawsuit out of it. The legal issues, however, are far from clear. While people say that, technically, the cache may violate copyright laws, so, then would everyone visiting a website that they don't own the copyright to - since the content is temporarily cached on your hard drive. It seems like this is a pretty clear case of fair use rights, and the story is making a big deal out of nothing.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
been there, done that
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
copyright
1) it works on opt-out rather than opt-in. As a web-reader I like it the way it is, as a web-master it can be annoying.
2) they spider places that are *not linked* on the internet, and then cache those areas. For instance, if you only linked to content at techdirt.com/content/... they would try spidering techdirt.com/ anyways. I suspect this is how they end up with password files and other embarrasing items. I think it's a little invasive to spider something that isn't linked on the internet, then to cache it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]