N.C. Senate Says You Should Be Able To Use Any Ink Cartridge You Want
from the good-for-them dept
With all the stories we have about printer ink cartridge scams - from Lexmark trying to stop a company from making compatible ink cartridges, to Epson forcing you to throw out cartridges with plenty of ink still in them - here's some good news. The North Carolina state Senate has approved a law that says you can't be barred by printer manufacturers from using whatever ink cartridge you want. They say it's the same thing as if Ford told people that you couldn't make any aftermarket modifications to your car unless you bought the products from Ford. The printer makers complain that the other cartridges are often frauds and can damage machines. In response, the Senator who sponsored the bill said that if they're frauds, then they'll get in trouble for deceptive trade practices. The bill still needs to be approved by the Governor.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
If VW had you arrested or sued for trying to use aftermarket parts, that might be close. Or better yet, if they welded the hood shut.
Voiding the warranty is of course up to the company. Then it's up to consumers if they want to support that company or not. Voting with the wallet is good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What About Razors
There are "copy" razors at the low end of the market, but I have never seen a copy at the high end (Mach 3, etc.). Gillette has something like two dozen patents on them, so I think they have that protection. If a "replacement" item can get their goods on the market without violating the patents, it should be allowed. Competition should make the manufacturer to keep innovating - cannabalize your own business before someone does it for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Analogy is worng
You buy Ford car, but you can only use the gas from the Ford dealer. Or, you buy a cell phone for nothing, but then gotta use that provider since the phone is locked. (of course noone has invoked DMCA on the cell. unlocking services yet though) This seems to be exactly what lexmark/epson are thinking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But they didn't complain then
The TRX suspension required a special wheel, which had both a non-standard offset and non-standard tire size. The only wheel that would fit on the suspension was a TRX wheel, and the only tire that would fit on the wheel was a Michelin TRX.
From http://www.mustangmonthly.com/thehistoryof/41542/index7.html:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Still not the same thing
The question is whether consumers need protection or whether they can/should be able to figure it out for themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]