Bill Aims To Curb Net Censorship Abroad
from the at-home-is-another-story... dept
Just as we've been told by our government that we need to censor the internet in our schools and libraries, a bill is being pushed through Congress that would create a new Office of Global Internet Freedom with $16 million to spend on technology to stop foreign nations from censoring the internet. Of course, I thought the US government was already funding just such a project by Bennett Haselton. The sponsors of the bill see it as the equivalent of working on Voice of America or Radio Free Europe.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Foreign nations bad, media companies good
Just an other example of the "govenment bad, commerce good" mindset that is blind to restrictions on freedom so long as they are imposed by non-state actors (oh, wait, that's terrorism).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Foreign nations bad, media companies good
Example: if/when McDonald's thinks that they can make more money selling vegetarian food, they'll do it. They're not fanatical beef evanagelizers -- they're a business. Sure, they may be much more likely to continue down the beef road because it's working for them, but that doesn't mean they're stupid. It just means that the market doesn't really think what people might like to believe it thinks.
Governments have constitutions restricting their actions because their power is otherwise practically absolute. Corporations are governed by the same laws that govern you and me. If you create a bunch of content and decide to offer it in your own "walled garden," what's *wrong* with that? I may not think it's a good idea, but it's fundamentally your property, not mine. If you write a book, should I get to read it for free? I might like to, but you'd be out of the book-writing business pretty damn quick if that was your business model.
Censorship isn't the same as not giving you free access to my stuff. I mean, really -- is charging for tickets to Star Wars censorship? That's your "walled garden." Cellphone plans that only give you low rates when you call their customers -- is that censorship? That's your walled garden too. Of course, the answer is no. Why not? Because you get to *choose* whether to involve yourself with these companies. Just because we don't get what we might like doesn't mean it's censorship, a violation of free speech, or even unfair or a bad idea.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Foreign nations bad, media companies good
Governments, though, have power over people to force them in ways that block off their rights to things. I don't think anyone has a right to access a commercial product (even if I do think much of the content industry would do better if they did open up their content).
[ link to this | view in thread ]