Return To Sender

from the should-we-make-spam-illegal? dept

The Guardian is commenting on Australia's recent decision to make spam illegal, along with moves in both Europe and the US to put in place some sort of anti-spam laws, and concludes that banning spam is the way to go. They admit that some spammers will move offshore and continue their incessant spamming - but believe that it will be a deterrent to a good number of spammers. I'm not sure. I'm as anti-spam as they come, but I doubt anti-spam laws will do very much. Most spammers will figure out ways around the laws. At the same time, I'm worried about the misuse of anti-spam laws. How long until someone just tries to send someone else a perfectly legitimate email and gets sued for breaking anti-spam laws?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    aumouse, 25 Jul 2003 @ 7:35am

    spam laws in au - not yet

    without having read the guardian article [it wouldnt load :( ] the federal au minister has only promised to introduce anti spam laws into parliament before the end of the year. knowing what a complete luddite / moron he is, im not holding my breath. he tried to ban not only phone sex lines but www pr0n. both just moved overseas. he tried to ban local www gambling. it moved to overseas hosting.... the au taxpayer subsidises federal politicians about $21 million just for stamps & envelopes for political spam. the current prime ministers idea to prevent terrorism is to send us fridge magnets ! i think there is huge lack of darwinism in our country.....

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Jul 2003 @ 8:42am

    If it didn't work, Spam would go away

    If spam didn't work - didn't get some sort of sales rate - it would die on it's own. Companies aren't going to pay for advertising that doesn't deliver sales (eventually), and if EVERYONE ignored spam, it would die on its own.

    Okay, since I and everyone else I know hate spam, and everyone on this site seems the same way, WHO is buying this (#$% advertised through spam? THEY are the ones who are keeping it in business.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Michael Ward, 25 Jul 2003 @ 11:28am

    spam

    Find the people who buy the spammers' services and get them to stop.

    Use social engineering. Boycott the products. Send Vinnie around to talk to them. Publish the home phone numbers of the presidents of companies that buy spam.

    As long as there is money to be made sending spam, spam will be sent. Follow the money, and cut off the supply.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.