Copying Is Theft And Other Legal Myths

from the nothing-is-clear dept

For years, I've argued that the entertainment industry is being incredibly misleading when it says that downloading is "theft" and no different than stealing a CD from a story. It's not. It's copyright infringement, which is a different issue altogether. Mark Rasch, who once ran the Justice Department's computer crime unit has written up a nice article explaining the legal issues behind copying music, pointing out that the Supreme Court has clearly said it's infringement, and not theft. Of course, that doesn't mean you won't go to jail for it. The article also describes what the law is, and what it takes to go to jail under the current system - though, it's not as clear cut as you might think. For all the talk that goes on here about file sharing, the legal issues are the least interesting to me. The important issue isn't whether or not file sharing is illegal (it clearly is in some cases and isn't in others), but whether or not copyright owners should learn how to use file sharing (whether illegal or not) to their advantage. My argument has always been that, even if it is illegal, companies are better off realizing there are more opportunities in allowing file sharing, than in pissing off their customers.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    SAMM, 28 Jul 2003 @ 2:27pm

    No Subject Given

    Well mike,
    It all depends on how creative the copyright holders are. Porn sites have used file sharing to generate millions in free revenue. Don't you think the music industry could do the same? Makes sense to me, but I'm odd.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    xdroop, 29 Jul 2003 @ 4:59am

    Don't have to

    Could they find ways to use free distributions? Definitely. Should they find ways to leverage free distributions? Probably. But do they have to? No.

    The beauty of the system is that the copyright holders don't have to let any copies be made. They can dictate the terms through which copies are legally made.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.