Bono Introduces Legislation Aimed At Spyware
from the good,-but-surprising dept
Rep. Mary Bono, who is known for her close association with the music industry, has introduced some legislation that would, effectively, ban the use of spyware. Called the Safeguard Against Privacy Invasions Act, it would require any company that used spyware to notify users before spyware is installed. Of course, most companies that use spyware already do so by hiding it in their end user license agreement. The surprising thing, to me, is that Bono is introducing this legislation. The rise of spyware may be one of the things that is holding back even more widespread use of the various file sharing networks. Many of those networks use spyware, and Bono has come out clearly against those services. Forcing them to cut out using spyware (or at least be more explicit about them) would mean that those who have avoided them out of fear of spyware would now be able to use the file sharing networks as well.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Banning Spyware
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This website is better than Slashdot
[ link to this | view in thread ]
spyware... and other
Second comment--one of the things that's nice about this site is that there are NOT so many dipshits posting off topic garbage, flaming, et al. Links to this site have been on slashdot already; thankfully (from my perspective--Mike may not agree), most of those people have stayed put. Honestly, though I still read /. from time to time, I almost never take the time to post--just catching up on what's already posted takes hours! Bottom line: too many people and poor moderation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: spyware... and other
No, I'm quite happy to let Slashdotters stay where they are. Over the past few years, we've been linked from Slashdot four or five times, and each time we get that initial big hit of traffic, and then a small sustained bump. We actually get a good amount of traffic, but not many comments for the amount of traffic.
We also do get our share of moron commenters, but they (usually) go away pretty quickly once they realize that Techdirt readers ignore them. A few moron commenters seem to stick around for extended periods of time before fading off. On the whole, though, the people who comment are usually pretty insightful, and I enjoy a smaller number of high quality comments over a large number of moronic comments any day.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm amused...
(Not that I don't agree with what you're saying about /., though.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I'm amused...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Banning Spyware
I mean, like Mike said, all these companies already DO ask for "permission" (Personally I don't think putting in 2 lines of 8 point font in the 15th page of a 23 page EULA constitutes "asking permission" but what do I know? I'm not a lawyer). So how is this going to cut off their revenue stream?
[ link to this | view in thread ]