Internet Access Is Not Quite A Human Right
from the just-misses-the-cut dept
While a few places have tried declaring internet access as a "basic human right", it appears that the UN says it doesn't make the cut, just yet (and rightfully so). There are plenty of other issues which clearly supersede internet access on the list of basic human rights, and in places that are struggling to feed, clothe and shelter their population, the last thing they're thinking about is how to wire up a computer.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Basic Human Rights
They even have it in their human rights charter. Communists! Net access before healthcare, I say - it's the american way.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
If internet access is a "basic human right", this means that all humans who existed prior to the development of the internet had this particular right violated.
Also, if a technology on the verge of being developed (e.g., a new AIDS drug) is considered a human right, development can be stifled, especially if drug companies are mandated to give their product away for free. They won't develop it at all if they aren't permited to profit from it, or at the very least, cover the cost of its development, production and distribution.
[ link to this | view in thread ]