Stealing The Internet
from the why-not-steal-it-back? dept
A painfully pessimistic opinion piece looks at a number of different moves lately by big business to set up artificial barriers online and concludes that big business is "stealing the internet", by taking away its promise as a free and open platform for anyone to communicate however they want. While I agree that some of the moves by various companies are ridiculous, that doesn't mean they'll all succeed. I'm still optimistic enough to think that, perhaps with a bit of education, people can be mobilized to prevent having the internet turn into a metered broadcast medium. And, if it does happen, what's to stop the rest of us from routing around them and creating the open network we know the world wants?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The Barbed Wire of the Wireless World
So it is with our connected world. Some day, human rights activists might show graphic black-and-white photos of children with sad stares being "oppressed" by wireless technology. I remember having a professor in college who was upset by the fact that South Africa (during the Apartheid Era) was the world's largest importer of barbed wire. (I could think of plenty of legitimate uses of barbed wire for South Africa's agrarian economy, but I didn't fight the professor.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Heck, 10 years the Internet wasn't accessible or affordable by most companies much less consumers and the access cost for many businesses was metered (and not cheap by any measure). As for metered service, why shouldn't heavy users that put the highest demands on hardware and bandwidth pay more? I should pay the same as the kid down the street who is downloading a few gigs of Divx movie files per day? I think not.
At this point the access providers are the gatekeepers and they can and will charge what they want until/unless the government decides that Interest access is a public utility and regulates it.
Will this happen? Yeah, I'm guessing it eventually will in some fashion as the Internet evolves from novelty to necessity. But it's gonna be a long bumpy ride.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Doubtful of Metered Internet
Look at long distance. There is really no reason that it should be metered, yet most people pay by the minute. However, there are now plans coming on the market for a flat fee long distance plan, allowing you to talk to grandma in (put distant country here) for hours.
Internet will be a part of a bundled package along with your telecom and TV stream. The question will be whether the right regulations (or lack of regulations) let cable, DSL, etc. all compete for this business.
On the other hand, take a look at the taxes (plural) line on your next telephone bill. Any proposal that is adopted will have to give the feds a piece of the action, and I will admit that metered anything brings in more tax revenue than a flat plan.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
1. definable
It isn't. When you say the internet is shrinking, are you talking about the www, email, irc, the newsgroups? Be specific man!
2. assuming the internet is definable,
1. it is shrinking. This would mean that it has tangible size to begin with. What? Are you on crack?
There are more internet users and public sites now than ever. Oh, and they have faster connections. Granted there are more commercial than ever, and more gated sites than ever. That is the nature of the internet. It's been this way as long as I can remember. Even before people started trying to regulate the wind and hold back the tides of change. It was and is inevitable.
Sure, they can watch you if they wanted to, but that is part of the deal. If everything is free an open for you to communicate, then it's free and open for people to watch you, and check your mail for you, and even send you invasive spyware. It's their right as much as it is yours to be free and open.
I'm sick of people assuming that the promise of technology is one sided.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the end of the Internet?
You underestimate the power of lobbyists. Just as Sen. Hollings has been trying to outlaw computers so that they can't be used to listen to copyrighted music without paying a fee, big companies will have no qualms about exerting pressure on Congress to outlaw communications networks that let people bypass them. That will happen when the Baby Bells, the long distance carriers, Microsoft, AOL, and the big studios all merge into one gigantic corporation, which at the current rate may not be too far in the future.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]