The Real Internet Revolution

from the no-VCs-needed dept

A month or so ago, I had lunch with a venture capitalist friend who I hadn't seen in a while. We caught up on a bunch of different things, and at the end, he mentioned, "you're the happiest entrepreneur I've talked to in probably three years." I told him that was because I wasn't looking for venture capital. Also, I've seen plenty of other "happy" entrepreneurs, and just about all of them also have no interest in venture capital, but are bootstrapping companies successfully. During the boom years, there was a myth that became way too popular that every startup needed to raise venture capital. In fact, many were judging how successful a startup was by how much venture capital they raised (as opposed to more reasonable metrics like, say, customers, revenue, or profitability). Certainly, there are businesses that require venture capital to implement their business plan (usually businesses that are highly capital intensive at the beginning), but in the "post-boom" years, more entrepreneurs are realizing the benefits of bootstrapping, and growing at a more reasonable pace. Business Week is writing about how many of these bootstrapped companies are doing really well right now, in part, because they didn't go chasing after venture capital. Adding venture capital to a company changes many things about the company, and the pressure it faces. The bootstrapped companies tend to be more customer focused (if they're not, they go out of business). Even more important, though, is that these bootstrapped companies are taking all the lessons that the no-longer-in-existence venture-backed dot com companies of the boom learned about the internet, and are applying them successfully. Plus, they're taking advantage of what's cheap now. People seem to forget, in the boom years, capital was cheap, but everything else (people, real estate, equipment) was expensive. These days, capital may be expensive but people, real estate, and equipment are incredibly cheap. If you can bootstrap, you get around the expensive part, and business looks good. Hence, the roving band of happy entrepreneurs.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 6 Aug 2003 @ 10:26am

    And then, there are also terrible bootstrapped com

    founded by losers with no clue of how the real world works, who go utterly spastic at hiring someone they don't know.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Mike, 6 Aug 2003 @ 11:37am

      Re: And then, there are also terrible bootstrapped

      Not quite sure what your point is, or what it has to do with this story. Of course there are some bootstrapped companies that aren't going to do well. I don't think anyone indicated otherwise.

      The point was simply that the venture model doesn't work for everyone, and companies are finally realizing that.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 6 Aug 2003 @ 12:42pm

        Re: And then, there are also terrible bootstrapped

        Hehehe, I knew Mike wouldn't "understand". We have this cultural mystique built around the concept of propeller-heads who start their business in a garage and become the next Big Bad Empire, so they can join the Big Bad Boys they opposed in the first place.

        The reality is that most "bootstrapping" companies are more accurately described as "terrible companies that haven't received funding yet".


        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Mike, 6 Aug 2003 @ 1:28pm

          Re: And then, there are also terrible bootstrapped

          Er, there is no cultural "mystique" around bootstrapping. The culturla mystique has always been around getting gobs of venture capital.

          Even venture capitalist admit that too many companies think they need venture funding when the reality is they don't.

          I understand your point just fine. It just has nothing to do with what we're talking about, and is, well, wrong.

          Having fun trolling?

          link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.