Cell Phones Not A Major Distraction

from the yes,-but... dept

Wed, Aug 6th 2003 12:23pm — Mike Masnick

Following on a similar report we had a a couple months ago, is this new study saying that mobile phones aren't responsible for nearly as much distraction as things like fiddling with the radio. Even while I question the benefit of banning driving while yakking, I think this study is pretty misleading. It just points out that more people tend to do things like talk to a passenger, reach for something, or fiddle with the radio than to use a mobile phone. That doesn't seem to take into account how distracting any of these actions are. Also, it doesn't consider how much time is spent on any of these activities. Reaching for something takes a second or two. Talking on the phone goes on for a while. I'm all for more research in this area, but it needs to be better than this.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

2 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

sbdwestpac, 6 Aug 2003 @ 12:44pm

different issue
This reminds me of a study showing how sleep deprivation affects drivers that one of the tabloid shows (20/20?) showed a year or so ago. They showed how the drivers rammed into objects and ran over traffic cones like crazy while sleepy, but what they didn't show was how the same drivers performed before the sleep deprivation, i.e. obtained a baseline. Some of the obstacles included a deer cutout that popped up in the road several feet in front of the car and a car cutout that suddenly pulled in front of the car, simulating a car running a red light. All of the drivers hit both items, but in both cases it was obvious that even an alert driver would have had a difficult time stopping or avoiding the object because both situations were unrealistic. By failing to show how the drivers reacted while alert the whole study was pointless.

As to the study, it only takes a second to change the radio station or turn the A/C on, but it takes longer than that to pick up a cell phone and answer it. Talking on any phone requires more concentration than normal conversation simply because it's harder to hear.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Munich, 6 Aug 2003 @ 2:21pm

Driving for miles 20mph below speed
And changing the radio or air conditioner never caused anyone to drive 20mph slower than the rest of traffic in the left lane for 10 miles. I see that and weaving while on the cell phone ALL THE TIME.
[ link to this | view in thread ]