When Do You Charge, When Should You Be Free?
Apologies for the unusually long post, but it's an interesting topic, and a short post wouldn't do it justice. Alan Reiter has posted the question on his blog about charging for WiFi, saying he needs to tell his clients when to charge and when to be free. It's a question that a lot of people are struggling with, and I think I have a reasonable answer:You can charge for your WiFi access point if there's a reasonable expectation that there will be no competing WiFi in the area. It's that simple - except it isn't. The "area" in which free WiFi might be available may differ based on the customers. Some will be willing to travel distances to get the free WiFi over paid WiFi. However, if you think that the majority of your customers (a) won't be willing to do what's necessary to get to free WiFi and (b) are willing to spend enough to make the additional costs (billing, tracking, maintenance, security) of paid WiFi, then you can probably get away with charging. Other than that, if you want to charge for your WiFi, it had better be bundled with something else, so that the overall value to the customer goes up (making the competition no longer between two equal products in the mind of the customer).
It goes back to simple economics: in a competitive situation, price will get forced down to marginal cost - and the marginal cost of letting another person get on your WiFi network is zero. So, if your WiFi is seen in competition with an equal (in the mind of the customer) WiFi access point, the price will eventually get driven to zero. Also, if there's no equal WiFi offering currently in competition with you, you'd also better be sure there won't be in the future (so it helps to control a wide area of land, such as an airport). So, if you're JimmyBob's coffee shop and you want to charge, realize that BillieSue's laundromat across the street may set up free WiFi, and your plans to charge will disappear.
The other option is to make your offering not in direct competition, and provide a service in addition to the connection that has a perceived value that exceeds the price you want to charge. For example, if you can convince people that a secure VPN is worth it, then you can charge for that. In some cases, this value may be entirely perceived (branding). So, perhaps people will be willing to pay for SBC WiFi because they somehow "trust" SBC.
If those don't hold true, then you're going to be forced into providing free WiFi - which isn't a bad thing. If you have something that is being driven down to a price of zero, then you might as well use it as a promotional item to advertise for something else. For example, Schlotzky's Deli using WiFi to bring in more customers.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Free and unfettered access for all (pretty please)
http://www.donkeyontheedge.com/internet_culture_and_politics/charging_for_wifi.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Agreed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hmm
No it doesn't, not unless you have perfect competition - which is relatively rare, even amongst apparently identical products like wifi.
" and the marginal cost of letting another person get on your WiFi network is zero"
No it isn't...
And there are situations where you might be wise to sacrifice market share, in order to get more profit - this article seems awfully specific that wifi would have to be a secondary thing - something to sell the main thing.
What use is wifi at the laundromat when I want coffee anyway?
[ link to this | view in thread ]