Unintended Consequences Of Making VC Returns Public
from the bad-news dept
We've covered the debate over whether or not public entities that invest in VC funds should make the VC returns info public. While I have no problem with people having more information, this is one situation where the information is bound to be misinterpreted - and should only be released with a lot of educational material. The biggest problem is that the numbers look like public company type numbers, so people judge them in the same way. But, they're not the same at all. First off, VCs are investing for the long haul, and returns over the first few years are supposed to be negative. Second, a lot of the valuations are practically made up numbers. They mean nothing because the shares aren't liquid and there's no real market for them. It's just based on an agreed upon number. The other problem with such numbers is that, suddenly, people start looking at the results on a quarterly basis - which is ridiculous if you're a VC fund or a startup company. One of the reasons to stay private is to have a longer time horizon on which you're judged. It allows you to make longer term decisions. Tim Oren, a venture capitalist, has written up a much longer (but well worth the read) piece on some more "unintended consequences" of making this info public, suggesting that it's going to do a lot more harm to pensioners and anyone who has their money invested by public entities. I'm not completely negative on the idea - and I hope that, with some education of both journalists and investors, a lot of these problems can be alleviated. However, as it stands, there are going to be more bad articles like the one Oren rips apart.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
