Verizon Doth Protest Too Much, Methinks
In Shakespeare's Hamlet, suspicion of ulterior motives arose upon an overly emphatic opposition. Since all the world's indeed a stage, Verizon Wireless's star actor Dennis Strigl is now making it obvious that their motivation to rush Wireless Local Number Portability is not for the public interest, but for profit. Not to be critical - shareholder value should be the goal of VZW. Yet while industry analysts agree that Verizon will be market share beneficiary when WLNP is mandated, Verizon has acted like it is only motivated by what's best for America. The more they snitch on the other telcos for heel-dragging, and the more they over-act benevolent, the more manipulative they seem. The linked article discusses some barriers to churn that other wireless carriers want to impose on consumers. Verizon dismisses them with more overacting than Don Knotts, but I offer my take: 1) A porting fee to be charged when a customer switches away. This is bogus, since all customers benefit from WLNP. Increased competition results in better service and lower prices for customers who stay, and those who switch. The costs should be swallowed by the carrier, or applied evenly to all subscribers. 2) Restricted porting hours. Whaa? Bogus, give customers a method of switching to a new carrier any time, any place. 3) Account closure. This is one very legit claim carriers make. Carriers will incur costs when they port a customer to another carrier, and they do not want to incur the additional cost until customers are fully paid up on their bills. Without this requirement, it would be like a customer eating food at a restaurant, not paying the bill, but demanding that the restaurant provide a free taxi ride home.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
